Hundreds of students have washed up on our shores bemoaning their inability to improve their Reading Comprehension only to discover its as learnable as the rest of the test. Here's how.
LSAT Logical Reasoning requires neither mastery of formal logic nor the ability to diagram arguments. Don’t fall for this gimmick. Read on to discover our more intuitive approach to LR.
Arguments comprise most of the LSAT. Honing your ability to eviscerate bad arguments is a surefire method for improving your score on the test's Logical Reasoning section.
Developing an intuitive understanding of conditional logic will improve your LSAT score. If you’re still misunderstanding conditional logic, then you need to read this article. See what we did there?
To understand LSAT Logical Reasoning questions, you must understand how an argument functions. Here’s what you need to know about arguments and how to evaluate them.
What makes an argument valid or invalid? Why is validity important on Logical Reasoning? Learning the differences between good and bad arguments will improve your LSAT score.
There’s lots of information out there about applying to law schools in the US. How much of it applies to Canadian schools? Here’s what you need to know about applying to law school in Canada.
Congratulations, you’ve completed your first practice LSAT. You’ve dipped your toe in very big water. Nice job!
The purpose of this lesson is to give you permission to ignore the whole “Games Types” chapter of the traditional LSAT-prep catechism. Stop worrying about the semantics, free up a bit of your brain’s processing power, and use that power to actually solve each game.
Two different kinds of skipping pop up on the LSAT. Some students want to skip questions and do them out of order. Some students want to skip answer choices when they think they’ve found the correct answer. Both types of skipping should be avoided, with a few exceptions.